Crider v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2012
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brackens v. State · 181 Ind. App. 634 - State v. Holmes · Lehiy v. State · Gill v. State · Lehiy v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, a prosecution for an offense is barred unless it is commenced: (1) within five (5) years after the commission of a Class B, Class C, or Class D felony; [[Image here]] (d) The period within which a prosecution must be commenced does not include any period in which: [[Image here]] (2) the accused person conceals evidence of the offense, and evidence sufficient to charge him with that offense is unknown to the prosecuting authority and could not have been discovered by that authority by exercise of due diligence; [[Image here]]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Sipe v. State · Umfleet v. State“[Crider] thereby successfully concealed the fact of his erimes by his positive acts of intimidation of his victims; thus, the statute of limitations did not rum until the victim made her disclosure to authorities.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Sloan v. State · Thakkar v. State“some of the acts ... had taken place more than five years prior to the charges being filed,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sloan v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.