Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 531 NE2D 1190 - Brown v. Conrad

Brown v. Conrad’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2019

8 state decisions

401988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miller v. Griesel · Huff v. Travelers Indemnity Co. · Memorial Hospital of South Bend, Inc. v. Scott · Bridgewater v. Economy Engineering Co. · Coffel v. Perry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"When a new trial is granted because the verdict ... [does] not accord with the evidence, the court shall make special findings of fact upon each material issue or element of the claim or defense upon which a new trial is granted. Such finding shall indicate whether the decision is against the weight of the evidence or whether it is clearly erroneous as contrary to or not supported by the evidence; if the decision is found to be against the weight of the evidence, the findings shall relate the supporting and opposing evidence to each issue upon which a new trial is granted; if the decision is found to be clearly erroneous as contrary to or not supported by the evidence, the findings shall show why judgment was not entered upon the evidence."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"The sole duty of an appellate court is to examine the record to see if: (a) The trial court abused its judicial discretion; (b) A flagrant injustice has been done the appellant; or (c) A very strong case for relief from the trial court's ordering a new trial has been made by the appellant...." Id. 261 Ind. at 33, 300 N.E.2d at 54 ; see also Brown v. Conrad (1988), Ind.App., 531 N.E.2d 1190 , trans. denied.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the [c]ourt instructs you that as a matter of law you must find [Brown] to be 100% at fault in this case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.