Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 531 NE2D 1386 - Schweitzer v. State

Schweitzer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Oklahoma · Gilliam v. State · Harris v. State · Lowery v. State · Owen v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[to succeed in showing abuse of discretion, the defendant must show that the jurors were exposed to trial publicity or that they violated an admonition to refrain from viewing media coverage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A motion to suppress does not preserve error for appellate review. The movant must also object at trial when the evidence is offered. Lindsey v. State (1985), Ind., 485 N.E.2d 102 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “prejudicial pretrial publicity and juror inability to render an impartial decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.