Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 531 NW2D 17 - Gesinger v. Gesinger

Gesinger v. Gesinger’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
4
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2024

13 state decisions

601995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hilton v. Guyot · National Farmers Union Insurance Companies 27 v. Crow Tribe of Indians · Iowa Mutual Insurance v. LaPlante · Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. Ben Cooper, Inc. · West v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) The tribal court had jurisdiction over both the subject matter and the parties; (b) The order or judgment was not fraudulently obtained; (c) The order or judgment was obtained by a process that assures the requisites of an impartial administration of justice including but not limited to due notice and a hearing; (d) The order or judgment complies with the laws, ordinances and regulations of the jurisdiction from which it was obtained; and (e) The order or judgment does not contravene the public policy of the State of South Dakota.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “inappropriate for states to assert jurisdiction over `reservation affairs' if it would interfere with tribal sovereignty and self-government and impair the authority of tribal courts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.