Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 531 P.2d 1038 - Fred v. State

Fred v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1987
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Maguire v. United States · Roberts v. State · Miller v. United States · Pate v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . This Court will not disturb the trial court’s ruling permitting the introduction of a confession if supported by sufficient evidence that the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his rights and understood the consequences of said waiver. Warren v. State, Okl.Cr., 495 P.2d 837 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““[Mjere delay in arraignment of a prisoner will not render the statement or confession involuntary, nor inadmissible, if it is otherwise shown to be voluntary and given without coercion, fear produced by threats or mistreatment, or promises . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.