Bower v. Bower’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
130 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 134 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably 447 Pa. Super. 436 - Chiropractic Nutritional Associates, Inc. v. Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield (1995), 449 Pa. Super. 620 - Alan R. v. Kemper National Insurance Companies (1996)
130 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Feingold v. Bell of Pennsylvania · Firing v. Kephart · 370 Pa. Super. 611 - Majdic v. Cincinnati MacHine Co. · Masgai v. Masgai · Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Rapistan, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 134 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Preliminary objections, the end result of which would be dismissal of a cause of action, should be sustained only in cases that are clear and free from doubt. Baker v. Brennan, 419 Pa. 222, 225 , 213 A.2d 362, 364 (1965). The test on preliminary objections is whether it is clear and free from doubt from all of the facts pleaded that the pleader will be unable to prove facts legally sufficient to establish his right to relief. Firing v. Kephart, 466 Pa. 560, 563 , 353 A.2d 833, 835 (1976). To determine whether preliminary objections have been properly sustained, this court must consider as true all of the well-pleaded material facts set forth in appellant’s complaint and all reasonable inferences that may be drawn from those facts. Feingold v. Bell of Pennsylvania, 477 Pa. 1, 4 , 383 A.2d 791, 792 (1977); Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Rapistan, Inc., 472 Pa. 36, 42 , 371 A.2d 178, 181 (1976).”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.