Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

531 So. 2d 1067

531 So.2d 1067

13 Fla.L.Weekly 2333

Furr v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 12, 1988

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1988-10-12

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1995

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-10-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Nicholas Vance Furr appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Although the trial judge denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing, he did not attach to his order any portion of the files or record to refute Furr’s allegations.

¶2Accordingly, we reverse the order denying Furr’s motion and remand the case to the trial court. On remand, unless the case files and records conclusively show that Furr is not entitled to relief, the trial court shall order the state to file an answer. After receipt of the answer, the trial court shall determine whether an evidentiary hearing is required. If the trial court should summarily deny the motion again, it shall attach such portions of the record which conclusively refute Furr’s allegations. Any party aggrieved by the subsequent action of the trial court must file a notice of appeal within thirty days to obtain appellate review.

RYDER, Á.C.J., and FRANK and PARKER, JJ., concur.
/531/so2d/1067 · .json · Public domain