State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
November 1996
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · Jernigan v. Louisiana · 410 So. 2d 1381 - State v. Hernandez · 377 So. 2d 1222 - State v. Jernigan · 364 So. 2d 964 - State v. Weinberg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) there must be a prior justification for the intrusion into a protected area; (2) in the course of which the evidence is inadvertently discovered; and (3) where it is immediately apparently without close inspection that the items are evidence or contraband.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Thompson · State v. Brady
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.