Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 531 So. 2d 49 - Williams v. State

531 So. 2d 49 - Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2010

5 state decisions

301988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Collins v. Illinois · Ex Parte Harrell · 462 So. 2d 1037 - Vinzant v. State · 470 So. 2d 1303 - Harrell v. State · 421 So. 2d 1306 - Johnson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... `To justify conduct through a claim of self defense, the accused must neither provoke nor encourage the difficulty.... Additionally, some form of retreat is required to establish a claim of self defense.' Finchum v. State, 461 So.2d 37, 39 (Ala.Cr.App.1984) (citations omitted). `[O]ne who claims justification in the use of force must not have brought on the necessity of using it; he must have been entirely free from fault.' Commentary to Alabama Code 1975, ง 13A-3-23.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The general rule in Alabama is that if the evidence in a prosecution for homicide tends to show that the accused acted in self-defense, [ then ] he has the right to prove the victim's bad general reputation for peace and quiet, for violence, or a like trait, as tending to show that the victim was the aggressor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.