Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 531 SO2D 52 - Butler v. State

Butler v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2005
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2005

5 state decisions

20198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Brinegar v. United States · 456 So. 2d 1156 - Reeves v. State · 473 So. 2d 1149 - Primm v. State · 405 So. 2d 957 - Carter v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rebuttal evidence, even evidence of prior crimes, is generally admissible within the sound discretion of the trial court. Vincent v. State, 231 Ala. 657 , 165 So. 844 (1936); Jones v. State, [ 362 So.2d 1303 (Ala.Cr.App.1978)]; Norris v. State, 429 So.2d 649 (Ala.Cr.App.1982).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.