Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 531 S.W.2d 140 - Moore v. State

Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 2016

21 state decisions

12019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Seiffert v. State · Hielscher v. State · Mills v. State · Farris v. State · Butler v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““... on or about February 28, 1979, did then and there unlawfully while in the course of committing theft of property owned by Sampson Chow, hereafter styled the Complainant, and with intent to obtain and maintain control of the property, intentionally and knowingly threaten and place the Complainant in fear of imminent bodily injury and death by using and exhibiting a deadly weapon, namely a firearm.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Sidney v. State · Gomez v. State
  2. “The State is bound by its allegations in the indictment and must prove them beyond a reasonable doubt. Butler v. State, 429 S.W.2d 497 (Tex.Cr.App.1968); Seiffert v. State, 501 S.W.2d 124 (Tex.Cr.App.1973). Therefore, the State was bound to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellants robbed the complainant Shaw with a pistol. The proof of robbery with a sawed-off shotgun does not meet the burden.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Sidney v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.