Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 531 SW2D 346 - Bishoff v. State

Bishoff v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
May 1992
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 1992

8 state decisions

40197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mullaney v. Wilbur · McCarter v. State · Wright v. State · Pesch v. State · Ambers v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““He was convicted of the old Code offense of sodomy, and his election for punishment under the new Penal Code only made it necessary for the trial judge to determine from the proof which of the applicable sections of the new Code to apply. Both Secs. 21.06 (homosexual conduct) and 21.07 (public lewdness) replaced 'the old sodomy statute. Since the proof showed that the act of deviate sexual intercourse look place in a public place, (our emphasis), the court did not err in assessing punishment as a Class A misdemeanor under the provisions of said Sec. 21.07.” [3]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Black
  2. ““(a) A person commits an offense if he knowingly engages in any of the following acts in a public place or, if not in a public place, he is reckless about whether another is present who will be offended or alarmed by his act: “(1) .... “(2) an act of deviate sexual intercourse.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Longoria v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.