Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 531 U.S. 198 - Glover v. United States

Glover v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

663
cited by 663 later decisions
23
cited 23 times by the Supreme Court
19
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

259 federal appellate · 29 district · 99 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 663 later decisions (23 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly (2001), United States v. Knox (2002)

259 federal appellate · 29 district · 99 state decisions — followed in 19 states

3620200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedUnited States v. Glover (from Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Lockhart v. Fretwell · Argersinger v. Hamlin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 663 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'any amount of [additional] jail time has Sixth Amendment significance.'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]n order to avoid turning Strickland into an automatic rule of reversal in the non-capital sentencing context, we believe that in deciding [] an ineffectiveness claim, a court must determine whether there is a reasonable probability that but for trial counsel's errors the defendant’s non-capital sentence would have been significantly less harsh.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “case[s] where trial strategies, in retrospect, might be criticized for leading to a harsher sentence,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.