Board of Education v. Department of Health, Education & Welfare, Region 5’s Empirical Analysis
532 F.2d 1070 · 1976
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1990 · most notably Board of Education of City School District of City of New York v. Harris (1979), 541 F. Supp. 1120 - Adair v. Koppers Co., Inc. (1982)
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp. · Cardillo v. United States · Bohn Aluminum & Brass Corp. v. Storm King Corp. · Tee-Pak, Inc. v. St. Regis Paper Co. · S. J. Groves & Sons Co. v. Ohio Turnpike Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“****** * * * [Rule 56(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure] authorizes summary judgment only when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp., 321 U.S. 620 , 64 S.Ct. 724 , 88 L.Ed. 967 (1944); Tee-Pak, Inc. v. St. Regis Paper Co., 491 F.2d 1193, 1195 (6th Cir. 1974). In ruling on a motion for summary judgment, the court must construe evidence against the movant and in its most favorable light as to the party opposing the motion. Bohn Aluminum & Brass Corp. v. Storm King Corp., 303 F.2d 425, 427 (6th Cir. 1962). As said by Judge Shackelford Miller, Jr., in S. J. Groves & Sons Co. v. Ohio Turnpike Commission, 315 F.2d 235, 237 (6th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 824 , 84 S.Ct. 65 , 11 L.Ed.2d 57 (1963): “This Court has on several cases expressed the view that a trial judge should be slow in disposing of a case of any complexity on motion for summary judgment. * * * ” ******”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We agree with the District Court that the issue of non-implementation of a previously adopted desegregation plan involves genuine issues of material fact “unresolvable on the present record.” We hold that the three other grounds advanced by HEW for denying the Board’s application for funds also involve genuine issues of material fact. Therefore, the summary judgment must be reversed and the case remanded for appropriate evidentiary hearings and findings of fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.