Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 532 F.2d 64 - In Re Cessna Distributorship Antitrust Litigation. The Cessna Aircraft Company v. Skyways, Inc., the Cessna Aircraft Company v. The Honorable William H. Becker, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri

In Re Cessna Distributorship Antitrust Litigation. The Cessna Aircraft Company v. Skyways, Inc., the Cessna Aircraft Company v. The Honorable William H. Becker, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri’s Empirical Analysis

532 F.2d 64 · 1976

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
2
states following
January 2007
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently January 2007 · most notably Van-S-Aviation Corp. v. Piper Aircraft Corp. (1977), Smith v. Eighth Judicial District Court of State of Nevada (1997)

22 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

1801976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Foman v. Davis · Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. · Will v. United States · Stack v. Boyle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when that time comes, it will be too late effectively to review the ... order and rights conferred ... will have been lost, probably irreparably.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “rights asserted in the action; (2) it must be”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “"The District Court’s conclusion that leave of court was required to file the cross-claim was correct. Appellants could assert the cross-claim only in their answer. The answer could be amended without leave only within twenty days of service. Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a). The twenty day period had long since expired. Thus, leave of court was necessary.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.