Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 532 F.2d 767 - Warner v. Dunlap

Warner v. Dunlap’s Empirical Analysis

532 F.2d 767 · 1976

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2011

6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

3019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Marco Defunis et al. v. Charles Odegaard, President of the University of Washington. · Missouri v. Holland · Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Commissioners · United States v. California · United States v. Maine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “); The Whistler, 13 F. 295, 296 (D.Or. 1882) (”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Leech dealt with pilotage in waters forming the boundaries between two states and with 46 U.S.C. Sec. [8501(b) ] which permits a vessel to use a pilot licensed in either state regardless of which state's port the vessel travels to.... Block Island Sound, however, does not serve as a boundary between states.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle, pilots in bays, rivers, harbors, and ports of the United States shall be regulated only in conformity with the laws of the States.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Gillis

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.