Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 532 F.2d 952 - Capasso v. Minster Machine Co.

Capasso v. Minster Machine Co.’s Empirical Analysis

532 F.2d 952 · 1976

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
4
states following
August 1993
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 1993

10 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

90197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Webb v. Zern · Schreffler v. Birdsboro Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although the press was designed with a hand control safety feature, the adequacy of which is not challenged, it was also designed to permit operation by use of a foot control. Moreover, a device to permit such operation was a part of the original purchase order. Nevertheless, Minster provided no comparable safety device to prevent the operator's hands from becoming entangled in the operation area when the machine was operated by the foot switch. Given the testimony of plaintiff's experts, we think the issue of a defect in the press at the delivery date was for the jury, other defenses apart ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “was within the contemplation of the manufacturer at the sale date.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “underscored by the contemporaneous purchase of the foot pedal,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.