Strandlund v. Hawley’s Empirical Analysis
532 F.3d 741 · 2008
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams · Acevedo-Garcia v. Monroig · Elmore v. Henderson · Gaffney v. Riverboat Services of Indiana · Reinholdson v. Minnesota
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We review the district court's or der dismissing appellants for misjoinder under an abuse of discretion standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“was permitted to drop appellants from the case or whether it should merely have severed their claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.