Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 532 P.2d 399 - Haley v. Dreesen

Haley v. Dreesen’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
4
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2019

18 state decisions

7019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Koch v. Elkins · Pure Gas & Chemical Company v. Cook · Warren v. Marsh · Ando v.Woodberry · Texas Gulf Sulphur Company v. Robles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * When an assignment of error is premised upon an objection to an instruction which has been given the record must contain a clear statement, defining the matter objected to and explaining the grounds of the objection, sufficient to inform the trial judge of possible errors so he may have an opportunity to correct them. While this latter situation does hot always require the submission of the objecting party’s version of a proper instruction, if his objection is to the form or language of an instruction, rather than to the propriety of giving any instruction on the issue, the best way to inform the court of his position is by the submission of his suggested language, in writing if possible.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““* * * [A]ny party may file written requests that the court instruct the jury on the law as set forth in the requests. * * * No party may assign as error the giving or the failure to give an instruction unless he objects thereto before the jury retires to consider its verdict, stating distinctly the matter to which he objects and the grounds of his objection. * * * >>”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““ * * * This court has heretofore observed that the parties not only have this right but this duty, and in the absence of submission of a proper written instruction they are deemed to have waived the claimed error, Logan v. Pacific Inter-mountain Express, Wyo., 400 P.2d 488, 492 [(1965)].” Texas Gulf Sulphur Company v. Robles, Wyo., 511 P.2d 963, 969 (1973).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.