532 So. 2d 1304 - Allen v. Shows’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2013
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jones v. State · Pearson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. · 498 So. 2d 673 - DeMesme v. Stephenson · 438 So. 2d 426 - Southern California Funding, Inc. v. Hutto
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The record before the trial court at the summary judgment hearing established that at the time of the accident the truck was being driven without Defendant’s consent and, in fact, contrary to his specific orders. Thus, contrary to Plaintiffs contention, both express and implied consent of an owner, either of which is required in this kind of case for vicarious liability of the owner, are lacking. Id at 1304-05.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sevilla v. Dominguez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.