¶1Following our decision in Herring v. State, 501 So.2d 19 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), defendant was retried. Upon conviction, the trial court imposed a sentence in violation of the rule set forth in North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 12 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969). We therefore affirm the convictions and the sentence on Count II; vacate the sentence on Count I; and remand for resentencing.
532 So. 2d 1328
532 So.2d 1328
13 Fla.L.Weekly 2444
Herring v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 1, 1988
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1988-11-01
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1994
1 state decisions
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · 501 So. 2d 19 - Herring v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1988-11-01
View the full empirical analysis of this case →