Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 532 SO2D 484 - Jarman v. Jarman

Jarman v. Jarman’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 1990
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 519 So. 2d 1177 - Roland v. Roland · Conner v. Conner · Conner v. Conner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order to determine if one is entitled to damages for a frivolous appeal, the court must look at whether the appeal was taken solely for delay, whether the appeal raises serious legal questions, and whether counsel for appellant is sincere in advocating his position.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.