Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

532 So. 2d 564

Alexis v. Conley

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 1988

Louisiana Court of Appeal · decided 1988-10-21

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2007

1 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“It is the responsibility of the trial judge to provide written findings of fact and reasons for judgment when requested to do so. It is not the responsibility of a party litigant to contact a court reporter requesting a transcription of oral reasons for judgment. Necessarily, a party litigant may find a need to review reasons for judgment prior to taking an appeal.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 960 So. 2d 1008 - MacK v. City of Baton Rouge

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-10-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1WRIT GRANTED. Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 1917 in part provides:

“... [T]he court when requested to do so by a party shall give In writing its findings of fact and reasons for judgment,

¶2In the instant case, the trial judge gave oral findings of fact and reasons for judgment. After receiving the timely request for written reasons for judgment by relator’s counsel, the trial judge by telephone conference and letter suggested that relator’s counsel contact the court reporter and request a transcription of the reasons. It is the responsibility of the trial judge to provide written findings of fact and reasons for judgment when requested to do so. It is not the responsibility of a party litigant to contact a court reporter request*565ing a transcription of oral reasons for judgment. Necessarily, a party litigant may find a need to review reasons for judgment prior to taking an appeal.

¶3Therefore, the trial judge is hereby ordered to issue written findings of fact and reasons for judgment in accordance with the relator’s timely request.

/532/so2d/564 · .json · Public domain