Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

532 So. 2d 63

532 So.2d 63

13 Fla.L.Weekly 2329

Lester v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 13, 1988

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1988-10-13

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1989

2 state decisions

Relies on Harriel v. State · 528 So. 2d 902 - Shipley v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-10-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

ORFINGER, Judge.

¶1The appellant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed, but the imposition of court costs which were assessed without notice or an opportunity to be heard are quashed. Shipley v. State, 528 So.2d 902 (Fla.1988); Harriet v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla.1988). On remand, after proper notice and hearing, the court may reconsider the imposition of costs.

¶2CONVICTION and SENTENCE AFFIRMED; COSTS QUASHED.

DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur.
/532/so2d/63 · .json · Public domain