¶1concurring.
¶2Relator is entitled to a review (not appeal) of the judgment, but received that review when the court of appeal denied supervisory writs on March 3, 1988. The notation in that denial that “relator has an adequate remedy by review or appeal of the final judgment on the merits” simply means that relator may reraise the pre*751scription issue at the conclusion of the trial and, if necessary, on appeal thereafter.