Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 532 SW2D 766 - Steenbergen v. Commonwealth

Steenbergen v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2005
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Maxwell Oliver v. Henry E. Cowan, Superintendent, Etc. · Reams v. Commonwealth · King v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . This court has rejected the cloak of sanctity imposed by Oliver. [Oliver v. Cowan, 487 F.2d 895 (6th Cir.1973)]. In plain language, not subject to misinterpretation, the court has held that the guiding hand of counsel is not required in formal sentencing procedures because it is not a critical stage of the proceeding. This is particularly so when the accused has shown no prejudice in order to be entitled to the relief sought. . ” (Emphasis added). See Reams v. Commonwealth, Ky., 522 S.W.2d 853 (1975).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.