Lewis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Faretta v. California · United States v. Ross · McKaskle v. Wiggins · Arizona v. Gant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“and made irrelevant references to the Uniform Commercial Code. On appeal, the court held: The record in this case indicates that appellant is one of a loosely-formed group of citizens who believe that they are sovereign individuals, beyond the reach of any criminal court. These so-called”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“heavily on the trial court's assessment of an obstreperous defendant,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“shall suggest that the defendant may be incompetent to stand trial”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lindsey v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.