Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

532 U.S. 954

In re Workman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 29, 2001

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 2001-03-29

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 2007

4 federal appellate ·

Relies on Ganey v. North Carolina · Philip R. Workman v. Ricky Bell, Warden

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-03-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Stevens, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.

¶2Statement of Justice Stevens, with whom Justice Souter and Justice Breyer join, respecting the denial of the petition for writ of habeas corpus.

¶3As Judge Merritt pointed out in his opinion dissenting from the Court of Appeals’ denial of relief last September, see Workman v. Bell, 227 F. 3d 331, 332 (CA6 2000), this petitioner has raised serious questions concerning his eligibility for the death penalty. When this Court reviewed petitioner’s applications for relief in February, I was persuaded that those claims were sufficiently serious to require a foil evidentiary hearing before a factfinder. The majority of the Court, however, did not share that opinion. Workman v. Bell, 531 U.S. 1193. I remain of the view that such *955a hearing should be held, but acknowledge that the issue is effectively foreclosed by the action that the Court took in February.

/532/us/954 · .json · Public domain