In re Wright’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 1408 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership · Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz · Turner v. Rogers · Stern v. Marshall · Wolf v. Weinstein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) Does the creditor against whom the extension of the stay is sought agree to the stay extension? 2) Is it likely that the debtor will obtain a discharge in the pending case? 3) What is the nature of the debt held by the creditor? 4) What is the nature of the collateral held by the creditor? 5) Has the debtor made any purchases on the eve of bankruptcy? 6) What has been the debtor’s conduct in the pending case? 7) What are the reasons why the debtor wants to extend the automatic stay?; and 8) Are there any unique facts or circumstances particular to the pending case?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Acosta
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.