United States v. Blitz’s Empirical Analysis
533 F.2d 1329 · 1976
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently January 2013 · most notably United States v. Alvarez (1985), United States v. Giovannetti (1990)
26 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 80A · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 29 U.S.C. § 186 (§ 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))
Relies on Pinkerton v. United States · United States v. Calandra · Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Patterson v. United States · Nye & Nissen v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A market maker or trader purchases and sells securities as a principal for his own account.”). . Instead, SEPTA complains only that the reference to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.