Alabama Association of Insurance Agents v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Georgia Association of Independent Insurance Agents v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, National Association of Insurance Agents, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
72 federal appellate · 6 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 129 later decisions — most recently June 2006 · most notably 27 Cal. 3d 690 - Industrial Welfare Commission v. Superior Court (1980), Ball Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Mutual Hospital Insurance (1986)
72 federal appellate · 6 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. · Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States · Rodriguez v. New York · Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 129 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“extraneous material which may be available to explain the basis and purpose of the agency action”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]n determining whether a particular activity is a proper incident to banking or managing or controlling banks the Board shall consider whether its performance by an affiliate of a holding company can reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or unsound banking practices.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(A)n activity commenced de novo will tend to have pro-competitive effects, and consequently should be viewed more favorably.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.