Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 533 F.2d 486 - MGM Grand Hotel, Inc. v. Imperial Glass Co.

MGM Grand Hotel, Inc. v. Imperial Glass Co.’s Empirical Analysis

533 F.2d 486 · 1976

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Fristoe v. Reynolds Metals Co. (1980), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. First National Finance Company (1978)

14 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

16019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of America · William Radobenko and Mary G. Radobenko, His Wife, Individually and as Husband and Wife v. Automated Equipment Corporation, a California Corporation · Magill v. Lewis · Briggs v. Zamalloa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The primary purpose of Nevada's licensing statutes is to protect the public against both faulty construction and financial irresponsibility.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““First, is there any genuine issue as to any material fact? Second, if there is no genuine issue of fact, then, viewing the evidence and the inferences which may be drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the adverse party, is the movant entitled to prevail as a matter of law?””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to show such a degree of experience, financial responsibility and such general knowledge. . . [as is] necessary for the safety and protection of the public”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.