Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 533 F.2d 699 - United States v. Nance

United States v. Nance’s Empirical Analysis

533 F.2d 699 · 1976

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 14 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably United States v. Haldeman (1976), United States v. Diecidue (1979)

23 federal appellate · 14 district · 1 state decisions

19019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 292

Relies on Morissette v. United States · Russell v. United States · United States v. Cruikshank · United States v. Petrillo · Hartman v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Undoubtedly the language of the statute may be used in the general description of an offence, but it must be accompanied with such a statement of the facts and circumstances as will inform the accused of the specific offence, coming under the general description, with which he is charged.' United States v. Hess, 124 U.S. 483 , 487, (8 S.Ct. 571, 573, 31 L.Ed. 516) (1888),”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]n indictment not framed to apprise the defendant 'with reasonable certainty[ ] of the nature of the accusation against him is defective, although it may follow the language of the statute.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.