United States v. Eisner’s Empirical Analysis
533 F.2d 987 · 1976
Citation profile
45 federal appellate · 2 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably United States v. Stone (1984), United States v. Bagnariol (1981)
45 federal appellate · 2 district · 14 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952
Relies on In re Oliver · Estes v. Texas · Bell v. United States · Rewis v. United States · Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The standard to be applied in determining whether there is a sufficient record to support a trial judge's finding that grounds exist to exclude spectators from a courtroom is whether there has been an abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.