Coomer v. Yukins’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) the purpose of the questioning; (2) whether the place of the questioning was hostile or coercive; (3) the length of the questioning; and (4) other indica of custody such as whether the suspect was informed at the time that the questioning was voluntary or that the suspect was free to leave or to request the officers to do so; whether the suspect possessed unrestrained freedom of movement during questioning; and whether the suspect initiated contact with the police or voluntarily admitted the officers to the residence and acquiesced to their requests to answer some questions.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. United States v. Cook

2. “factors to consider, and that there is no governing United States Supreme Court precedent that has held that a person was in custody after being clearly advised that he or she was free to leave or terminate questioning). ¶ 41. Moreover, Melichar not only told Quigley he was not under arrest, he confirmed with Quigley that he understood that to be the case. Quigley affirmatively agreed, several times, that he came to the station of his own free will; no one forced him to come or told him that he was in custody —”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 370 Wis. 2d 702 - State v. Quigley

3. “United States v. Brown, 441 F.3d 1330, 1347 (11th Cir. 2006). Such advisements are”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 370 Wis. 2d 702 - State v. Quigley