Passmore v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
533 F.3d 658 · 2008
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably United States v. Lovelace (2009), McDonough v. Anoka County (2015)
26 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Richardson v. Perales · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Webster v. Fall · Walters v. National Assn. of Radiation Survivors
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Questions which merely lurk in the record, neither brought to the attention of the court nor ruled upon, are not to be considered as having been so decided as to constitute precedents.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]hen an issue is not squarely addressed in prior case law, we are not bound by precedent through stare decisis .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Due process requires that a claimant be given the opportunity to cross-examine and subpoena the individuals who submit reports. The ALJ, however, is not required to inform the claimant’s attorney that the claimant has a right to cross-examine the vocational expert. The ALJ is required to allow the claimant to cross-examine the witness, but if the claimant’s attorney fails to object to the post-hearing reports or remains silent when the opportunity to request cross-examination arises, the right to cross-examination is waived.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rahe v. Astrue
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.