McAdams v. McCord’s Empirical Analysis
533 F.3d 924 · 2008
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2024
8 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. General Electric Company · Thomas v. Basham · Cullen v. Margiotta · Hayden v. McDonald · Interstate Power Company v. Kansas City Power & Light Company & Kansas City Power & Light Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Judicial economy will be best preserved by delaying appeal until all issues can be confronted by this court in a unified package. Such a course is particularly desirable where ... the adjudicated and pending claims are closely related and stem from essentially the same factual allegations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.