Franklin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 2009
1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Turner v. Louisiana · Osborne v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whether the evidence of appellant's prior eriminal conviction was deliberately or accidentally placed before the jury is of little moment. The fact remains that improper evidence was submitted to the jury and considered by them without any prior knowledge of such occurrence by appellant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Schlabach v. State“(there is little question that the jury was influenced by an instrument which should never have been presented to them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Schlabach v. State“had been previously convicted and sentenced for a violation of the Indiana Controlled Substances Act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Schlabach v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.