Baum v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Matheney v. State (1997), Baker v. Marion County Office of Family & Children (2004)
5 federal appellate · 38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Baum v. State · Carman v. State · Baum v. State · Tillman v. Indiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“counsel in fact appeared and represented the petitioner in a procedurally fair setting which resulted in a judgment of the court.”
18 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Eller v. State · Annes v. State“poses no cognizable grounds for post-conviction relief.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. State · Graves v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.