¶1(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
¶2I concur in the majority opinion except for the dicta in footnote 2.
¶3I am hereby authorized to state that Justice KONENKAMP joins this concurrence in part and dissent in part.
533 N.W.2d 156
State v. Schweitzer
Decided June 14, 1995
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1995-06-14
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 2010
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →