Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 533 P.2d 25 - Gordon v. State

Gordon v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
November 2023
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2023

12 state decisions

70197519801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nye & Nissen v. United States · Time, Inc. v. Bon Air Hotel, Inc. · Beck v. United States · 5 Cal. 3d 129 - People v. Rogers · State v. Bailey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is essential that he in some way `... associate himself with the venture, that he participate in it as in something that he wishes to bring about, that he seek by his action to make it succeed.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The purpose of the rule is to emphasize the very suspect motivations of this class of witness. Such witnesses oftentimes are cooperating with the prosecution to obtain some special advantage for themselves, and they may be willing to distort the truth or to lay the entire blame on the defendant in hopes of avoiding further criminal liability or imprisonment. The instruction serves to inform the jury of this background of ‘intrigue, contrivance, distrust and prejudice to afford fundamental fairness to the parties consistent with due process of law.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The court . . . shall give the following basic instructions on all proper occasions : (2) That the testimony of an accomplice ought to be viewed with distrust and the oral admissions of a party with caution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.