Dill v. Rader’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 1998
8 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ada-Konawa Bridge Co. v. Cargo · 172 So. 2d 435 - City of Miami v. Simpson · Oklahoma City v. Foster · Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Radford · Hughes v. Bizzell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“so long as [the] harm is inflicted while the agent or servant is on duty, on the job, or fulfilling an employment-related mission; and the complained of act is incident to or activated by such service to the master or principal,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.