Hunter v. Hayes’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2016
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 26 Wis. 2d 683 - Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc. · Adler v. Adler · MOONY v. Craddock · Cowgill v. Neet
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Promise reasonably inducing action or forbearance. (1) Promise which the promissor should reasonably expect to induce action or forbearance on the part of the promisee or a third person and which does induce such action or forbearance is binding if injustice can be avoided only by enforcement of the promise. The remedy granted for breach may be limited as justice requires.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the defendant['s] contention that there was no evidence of a meeting of the minds on all the terms of a contract is accurate, but irrelevant[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“permit the application of the doctrine of promissory estoppel ... without evidence of a meeting of the minds or consideration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.