Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 533 So. 2d 124 - Cooley v. State

533 So. 2d 124 - Cooley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2016

10 state decisions

401988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 310 So. 2d 93 - Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc. · Superdome Services, Inc. v. State · Foster v. Hampton · 402 So. 2d 669 - Jenkins v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office · Michaelman v. Amiss

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Due to the general overcrowding in the state prison system and the advent of court orders limiting the population of certain institutions, it is common for inmates sentenced to hard labor and committed to the DPSC to serve relatively short sentences in parish jails in the custody of parish sheriffs. The sheriff is responsible for the care of these inmates. Besides the instances previously mentioned, the sheriff has absolute authority over the inmate without any control whatsoever exercised by the DPSC.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he correctness of the allegations of fact is conceded and every reasonable interpretation must be accorded to language of the petition in favor of maintaining its sufficiency and affording plaintiff the opportunity of presenting his evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A. The state of Louisiana shall not be liable for any damage caused by a ... sheriff ... within the course and scope of his official duties, or damage caused by an employee of a ... sheriff....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.