State v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 1997
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Watson v. Louisiana · 449 So. 2d 1321 - State v. Watson · 445 So. 2d 1171 - State v. Williams · State v. Banks · State ex rel. Hines v. Guillory
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When the purpose is to show that in the special case on trial the witness is biased, has an interest, or has been corrupted, it is competent to question him as to any particular fact showing or tending to show such bias, interest or corruption, and unless he distinctly admit such fact, any other witness may be examined to establish the same.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Quatrevingt“[i]f the charges had both remained open and viable, then relator could have received a sentence in excess of six (6) months. According to the dictates in the Tucker case, he would then be entitled to a jury trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fryer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.