Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 533 So. 2d 437 - Estes v. State

533 So. 2d 437 - Estes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably 681 So. 2d 521 - Hoops v. State (1996), 568 So. 2d 1173 - Roundtree v. State (1990)

51 state decisions

2701988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Neil v. Biggers · Rakas v. Illinois · 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · 460 So. 2d 778 - May v. State · 413 So. 2d 1372 - York v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well settled that when the trial judge sustains an objection to testimony and he directs the jury to disregard it, prejudicial error does not result.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Osborne v. State · Perkins v. State
  2. “[G]iven reasonable circumstances an officer may stop and detain a person to resolve an ambiguous situation without having sufficient knowledge to justify an arrest.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Shannon v. State · Linson v. State
  3. “Two or more offenses which are triable in the same court may be charged in the same indictment with a separate count for each offense if: (a) the offenses are based on the same act or transaction; or (b) the offenses are based on two or more acts or transactions connected together or constituting parts of a common scheme or plan.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. McCarty v. State · 542 So. 2d 222 - Blanks v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.