533 So. 2d 473 - Lanier v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 106 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 113 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2018 · most notably Montana v. Egelhoff (1996), 592 So. 2d 114 - Hansen v. State (1991)
2 federal appellate · 106 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bruton v. United States · Davis v. Alaska · Ohio v. Roberts · California v. Green · Ake v. Oklahoma
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 113 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“systematic exclusion of the group in the jury-selection process.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Simon v. State · Bounds v. State“... the critical question under the confrontation clause is not compliance with common law hearsay rules, but fulfillment of the `mission of the confrontation clause to advance the accuracy of the truth determining process ... by assuring that the trier of fact has a satisfactory basis for evaluating the truth of a prior statement.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“[I]t is this Court's role to inquire into whether there is any credible evidence upon which the jury could find the aggravating circumstance in question.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.