Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 533 SO2D 94 - State v. Taylor

State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur · 514 So. 2d 589 - State v. Cass

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Both of these remarks by the prosecutor were merely restatements of the evidence presented at trial and, therefore, were proper. Further, because no objection was made at the time these statements were made, the defendant waived his right to object later. LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 841. Id. at 97 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.