Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

533 S.W.2d 820

Ex parte Preston

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1976-03-03

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1980

3 state decisions

Relies on Ex Parte Sellers · Ex parte White · Ex parte Johnston

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1976-03-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1OPINION

DAVIS, Commissioner.

¶2This is an appeal from an order entered in a habeas corpus proceeding in Criminal District Court No. 1, Tarrant County, on July 8, 1975, denying the relief requested.

¶3Appellant contends that the court erred in not ordering the release of appellant for lack of probable cause to believe an offense had been committed.

¶4It has been duly brought to our attention that the appellant is now under indictment for murder in this case. The return of an indictment establishes probable cause as a matter of law. Therefore, the question of probable cause to hold appellant has been rendered moot.1Ex parte Sellers, Tex.Cr.App., 516 S.W.2d 665; Ex parte White, Tex.Cr.App., 486 S.W.2d 301.

¶5The appeal is dismissed.

¶6Opinion approved by the Court.

¶7. We call attention to Ex parte Johnston, 533 S.W.2d 349 (Tex.Cr.App.1976), holding that the return of an indictment does not render moot an appeal from a habeas corpus proceeding to set or reduce the amount of bail.

/533/sw2d/820 · .json · Public domain