Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 533 SW3D 315 - Prichard v. State

Prichard v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas))

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. State · Polk v. State · Patterson v. State · Tyra v. State · Clinton, Katherine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[B]ecause a legal-sufficiency challenge need not be preserved by objection in a trial court, appellant was permitted to present that complaint in the first instance to the court of appeals.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.